Time | Topic | Presenter (s) |
11:30 |
New Business & Informational Items
|
Dan Faltesek & Kelsey Emard Core Education Committee Co-Chairs |
11:35
|
Course Reviews
BA 100 Transitions - Specialized proposal |
Transitions |
1:30 | Adjourn |
Committee members present: Kelsey Emard (Co-chair), Daniel Faltesek (Co-chair), Andrea Allan, Vipin Arora, Aidas Banaitis, Abigail Crowell, Liz Delf, Matthew Kennedy, Lori McGraw, Brian Mills, Holly Mitchell, Kari-Lyn Sakuma, Dave Stemper, Paula Weiss
Committee members absent: Liz Delf
Ex-officio members present: Stephanie Baugh (Curriculum Management), Kali Furman (Difference, Power & Oppression), Heath Henry (General Education Assessment), McKenzie Huber (Core Education), Karen Watte (Ecampus)
Visitors and staff present: Caitlin Calascibetta (Faculty Senate Office), Andrew Valls (Executive Committee Liaison), Troy Hall, Michael Jefferis, Caryn Stoess
New Business & Informational Items
The co-chairs called the meeting to order and opened with a discussion around a Transitions pre-requisite update – no independent accreditation issue for any organization that can be found saying that you have any passing grade in any transitions course that should count. Does the committee need a policy, or can the registrar’s office handle it in transit? The College of Engineering (COE) has a policy that they don’t accept less than a C- but they had a petition process that allowed for 1 exception. They are changing their college policy to allow the exception for transition which does allow for students to pass with a D-, which is considered passing. Documentation will be provided on the Core Education (Core Ed) website and a list of affected courses with the C- typo will be forwarded to Course Management to update them. No policy was determined to be needed.
The co-chairs and Core Ed Director met with Kristin Benson to discuss developing guidelines for advisors on making decisions for what transfer courses meet Core Ed requirements. Prioritizing student agency, course availability and course applicability. Advisors being prepped on how to advertise the Core Ed to new students.
ENGR 333 has had its number changed and is being held in stasis and will likely stay that way indefinitely while college processes and human resources is involved. Questions of the authority of the Difference, Power & Oppression (DPO) director are still under question currently. A new ENGR course will come from Engineering.
Course Reviews
The committee reviewed and discussed the following Core Education proposals.
Action: Motion to approve BA 100 and BA 300; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to conditionally approve pending an Ecampus redevelopment proposal; seconded. 12, 0, 0.
Action: Motion to conditionally approve pending an Ecampus redevelopment proposal; seconded. The motion passed with 11 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to conditionally approve pending an Ecampus redevelopment proposal; seconded. The motion passed with 11 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 11 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to roll back and ask for some additional examples of how the course relates systems of oppression in the United States; seconded. The motion passed with 11 votes in favor, 1 vote in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve with recommendation to take DPO directors advice regarding language, change DPO II to DPO-A, and a note to copy details about intersectionality from CIM to the syllabus; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve with a request for clarification the essential assignments and fixing of minor misspellings; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to send back to make the previously requested changes and have the Forestry representative contact the originator; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to roll back for not meeting SLO 1 for the Beyond 1 category; seconded. The motion passed with 13 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 13 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to conditionally approve; seconded. The motion passed with 13 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 13 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 1 abstention1.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 13 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 0 abstentions.
Action: Motion to approve; seconded. The motion passed with 12 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition, and 1 abstention1.
Adjournment
With no further discussion or business before the committee, the co-chairs adjourned the meeting.